Friday, January 27, 2006
Werid Al is at it again!
Be sure to copy the link and turn your speakers up.
Parents are so frustrating
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Turbo
Turbo was an owner surrender. His previous owner had named him Jimmy. Well since I already have 1 Jimmy in the house we had to change his name. (Jim wouldn't have known if I was hollering at him or the dog)
We named him Turbo because from the time we got home until he crashed on Saturday, he was turbo-charged. That pup didn't slow down at all on Saturday. He was having too much fun with Fritz. They played all day long. The only time we could get him to stand still for a picture was when I was holding him.
We have a potenial adopter for him. He is head North to the state of Michigan. Wendy is so excited. She has been waiting patiently since the end of October for a puppy. Well Wendy meet your new baby.
Turbo maybe turbo charged when awake but when he crashes he becomes snuggle puppy.
Looks like this weekend he will meet his new mom.
You haven't been with us for very long Turbo, but you are going to take a piece of my heart with you when you go.
He won't have any problems adjusting. You should see him give Daisy a run for her money. It is so funny. It is like seeing a grandmother and a pesky grandchild butting heads.
So cute! Reminds me of Bumper as a pup. Very smart pup but also laid back. If Bumper and Tipsy had ever gotten together and had a litter Turbo would be one of their puppies. (For those of you who don't know Bumper and Tipsy, they are our babies.) Turbo is a smart puppy like Bumper but laid back like Tipsy. Except when he is terriorizing the others.
Roxanne
Roxanne was an owner surrender that just passed through on her way up north to Rockford. She was only with us for one night but left a lasting impression on me.
She was very lovable and sweet. Roxanne has been adopted by a lady who lost her BT after 13 years.
I know Roxanne will not make up for the one she lost but she has so much love to give.
Good Luck Foxy Roxy!
Diet Pop myth
Here is what I read:
Susan Mayne, a cancer epidemiologist at the Yale University School of medicine, and colleagues studied 1,095 cancer patients and compared them to 687 healthy control subjects. They conducted full dietary interviews and compiled data on how much regular and diet soda each subject drank.
The researchers found that soda drinkers were actually less likely to develop esophageal carcinoma. Furthermore, when the researchers separated subjects who drank mostly regular soda versus diet soda, they found that the latter group had a 53 percent lower risk of developing the cancer.
The researchers warned against chugging diet soda as a ward against cancer, however, since it carries its own health risks, such as damaging tooth enamel.
Two articles on the net: Both were the same thing. It was also written up in the journal for the National Cancer Institue.
People really should do their research before passing things on.


